Compare

Kraken vs Backpack

Fifteen years of track record against entry fees that are five times lower. Two very different arguments.

Introduction

Kraken has existed since 2011 and in those fifteen years has had no major loss of customer funds. Backpack is young, but charges entry fees that are a fraction of Kraken's and publishes daily proof of reserves. Data as at August 2026.

Head to head

Kraken ProBackpack
LicencesMiCA (CBI Ireland) + MiFID II (CySEC)MiCA (Latvijas Banka) + MiFID II (CySEC 273/15)
EntityPayward European Solutions Ltd (IE)Trek Technologies SIA (LV) · Trek Labs Europe Ltd (CY)
Operating since20112023
Spot fees (entry tier, maker/taker)0.40% / 0.80%, falling per tier0.08% / 0.10%
PerpetualsYes — 0.02% / 0.05% entry tierYes — 0.02% / 0.05% entry tier
CurrenciesEUR and USDUSD pairs only
Capital efficiencyCollateral sits idleCollateral earns interest while it serves as margin (auto-lend)
Proof of reservesQuarterlyDaily
Hack and loss historyNo major loss of customer funds since 2011None
Enforcement history6 decisions in 3 countriesNo enforcement record
Exchange score6.6 / 109.0 / 10

Costs

This is where the biggest difference sits, and it is big. Kraken Pro starts at 0.40%/0.80% and only comes down with volume; Backpack starts at 0.08%/0.10%. At a hundred thousand dollars a month you still pay 0.12%/0.25% at Kraken against 0.07%/0.09% at Backpack. Do note the distinction at Kraken: the ordinary app charges around 1 percent for instant buys, Kraken Pro is the cheap environment.

Safety and supervision

Both hold MiCA and MiFID II, so both may offer spot and derivatives in the EEA. Kraken has the longest clean track record in the sector: no major loss of customer funds since 2011. Against that, Kraken carries six enforcement decisions — among them an SEC settlement of $30 million over staking and an Australian fine of AU$8 million — while Backpack has none. Backpack publishes proof of reserves daily, Kraken quarterly.

Products

Both offer spot and perpetuals. Kraken also has equity CFDs, Backpack real equities. That difference is bigger than it looks: with a CFD you have no ownership, with a real share you do. There is one difference that no fee table shows and that bites harder than the rate on larger positions: what your collateral does while it is collateral. At Backpack, deposited funds keep earning interest through auto-lend while serving as margin for your positions at the same time — so it counts twice. At most other exchanges collateral sits idle: it covers your position and earns nothing. One caveat belongs with that: lent-out collateral can only be withdrawn while utilisation of the lending pool allows it. Check the numbers with the yield-on-collateral comparison.

How the scores are built

Kraken Pro scores 6.6 and Backpack 9.0. The score is the weighted sum of five pillars: regulation and oversight (25%), safety of funds (25%), product range (20%), costs (20%) and yield (10%). The full build-up is set out in the methodology.

Which one for whom?

Kraken Pro if a long track record and euro pairs weigh more heavily than the rate. Backpack if you steer on costs, want daily proof of reserves or need interest on your collateral. Run your own volume through the comparison tool — at high volumes Kraken's rates come down sharply.

Frequently asked questions

Is Kraken safer because it is older?

Age is no guarantee, but it is evidence. Kraken has had no major loss of customer funds since 2011, and that is measurable. Backpack is too young for such a track record, but sets daily proof of reserves against it.

Why is Kraken so much more expensive on the entry tier?

Kraken uses a classic volume-tier structure that starts at 0.40%/0.80% and falls quickly. Backpack starts low already. At very high volumes they move closer together; at retail amounts they do not.

What is the difference between real equities and equity CFDs?

With a real share you are the owner and entitled to dividends. With a CFD you have a contract with the provider on the price difference. We explain that on the page about real equities versus wrappers.

What does 'collateral that works twice' mean?

In a unified cross-margin account with auto-lend, your deposited funds keep earning interest in the lending pool while counting as margin for your open positions at the same time. So you earn interest and trade with the same money. The caveat: withdrawal is only possible while utilisation of that lending pool allows it.