Compare

Bitvavo vs Finst: the all-Dutch contest

Both claim "real shares" — but licences, settlement and transferability differ sharply.

Introduction

Bitvavo and Finst are both Dutch providers holding a MiCAR licence via the AFM, both spot-only and both built for euro users. Still, there are relevant differences in fees, ancillary costs and security. Reference date: July 2026.

Head-to-head

BitvavoFinst
LicenceMiCAR (AFM, Netherlands)MiCAR (AFM, Netherlands, granted July 2025)
Spot fees (maker/taker)0.10% / 0.25%0.15% / 0.15% (flat, all volumes)
RangeSpot crypto, broad selectionSpot crypto, 340+ assets, EUR pairs only
Proof of reservesQuarterly attestationNone
Hack/loss historyGenesis exposure (2022), clients compensatedNo incidents
Exchange score4.8 / 106.0 / 10

Costs

The structures differ: Finst charges a flat 0.15% for maker and taker; Bitvavo 0.10% maker / 0.25% taker. Limit-order users (maker) are cheaper at Bitvavo; instant buyers (taker) at Finst. Do mind Finst’s withdrawal fees, which can eat the advantage on small amounts — we flag this in the Finst profile too. Finst keeps it flat and predictable; at Bitvavo your order type matters.

Security and oversight

Same supervisor, different track record. Finst has no incidents but publishes no proof-of-reserves attestations. Bitvavo does publish quarterly PoR, but carries the 2022 Genesis loss in our security pillar (clients were compensated). On balance Finst scores higher here — a clean history weighs more than attestation frequency in our methodology.

Products

Both are spot-only; neither offers derivatives or stocks. Finst lists EUR pairs exclusively; Bitvavo has a broader set of trading pairs. If you ever want perpetuals or stocks, look at MiFID II venues — see the perpetuals comparison.

The scores explained

Finst scores 6.0, Bitvavo 4.8. Finst wins on security (no loss history); Bitvavo wins on PoR transparency but loses that advantage to the Genesis loss. Full breakdown per pillar: methodology.

Who should pick which?

Finst for the lowest flat fee and a clean history, if EUR pairs are enough. Bitvavo for a broader range and PoR reporting. Trading bigger volume? Compare beyond the Netherlands too — the comparison tool lines everything up.

Frequently asked questions

Is Finst cheaper than Bitvavo?

It depends on your order type: as a taker (instant buy) Finst is cheaper (0.15% vs 0.25%); as a maker Bitvavo is (0.10% vs 0.15%). On small amounts Finst’s withdrawal fees can tilt the picture further.

Is Finst reliable?

Finst holds an AFM MiCAR licence (July 2025), has no incident history and passports to 30 EU countries. What’s missing are proof-of-reserves attestations — which factors into its 6.0 score.

Why does Bitvavo score lower than Finst?

Mainly the security pillar: the 2022 Genesis loss counts regardless of compensation. On costs and PoR transparency they are close.